0x8d...a265 on Agora

Delegate Statement

I vote for what I think best aligns with the long term benefit of all Uniswap protocol stakeholders, including token holders, LPs, and traders.

I'm a risk analyst with Block Analitica (primary risk management consultant for MakerDAO) in my day job, and moonlight as a governance participant and delegate for a few other protocols including Uniswap.

I've been an active UNI voter since launch of governance back in 2020, and am proud to have a consistent record of participation, voting on nearly every valid/non-cancelled on chain proposal.

I'm lucky to have significant support from a few unknown large token holders. While I welcome additional support from new delegators, I also think it would be great to spread delegations around to newer, up and coming delegates to support decentralization and increase governance participation!

Top Issues

Fee switch

I think fee switches should only be turned on after careful review of potential risks vs benefits. Generally I favor a cautious approach, and believe Uniswap protocol generally stands to benefit more from user growth and adoption rather than extracting fees prematurely.

Cross chain deployments

Generally think Uniswap should have a bias for action / saying yes to cross chain deployments. As long as a suitably secure bridge is available for governance message passing, there's little risk in deploying to a chain that ends up having limited adoption.

Public goods

Defi eduction fund seems to be going well, contrary to what many people expected at the time it was proposed. I think Uniswap governance should be open to consider funding other high quality public goods projects in the future.